Announcement // Claire partners with INSEAD AI Venture Lab and Google Cloud

Responsible AI / Human-centric / EU compliant

The all-in-one platform for agentic assessment

User interface of an AI interview platform showing a smiling woman on video, a timer at 14 seconds, interview instructions, and a live transcript panel with a message from Claire asking if the interviewee is ready to start.

Ethical AI, by design.

Our platform aligns with the GDPR & EU AI Act.

Launch AI-inclusive assessments without sacrificing learning outcomes. Add a conversational layer to evaluate agency, ownership and mastery.

Get started

Agentic assessments

Benefit from oral assessments, at scale

Deploy AI agents that follow your playbooks and conduct student interviews to evaluate how well students master topic and knowledge.

Conduct follow-up interviews to ensure students have true agency and ownership over the work they submit or engage students in structured debates to surface deep conceptual understanding.

Integrate written, oral or hybrid assessments into your course.

User interface of Socratic rebuttal agent showing instructions for providing formative feedback to students using a Socratic method, with agent type dropdown and test submission selection.

Most AI tools automate grading for you. We don't. We keep you compliant.

End-to-end assessment platform

AI to augment your expertise, not automate grading.

Claire comes with powerful, non-intrusive AI features that help you grade and provide better feedback, with a human-centric design that mitigates common AI risks.

A screenshot of Claire's feedback report

UI to approve AI suggestions on student assignment

Tab, tab, tab ⇥ to approve

Claire writes repetitive grading remarks for you, which you can approve or reject as you see fit.

80%

of grading remarks written by Claire are approved by users.

Backed by the latest research in educator-AI collaboration, assessment, and feedback.

Discover more supporting research here.

Li, Y., Shan, Z., Raković, M. et al. When AI explains in natural language: Unveiling the impact of generative AI explanations on educators’ grading and feedback practices. Educ Inf Technol (2025) | View article

Henderson, M., Bearman, M., Chung, J., Fawns, T., Buckingham Shum, S., Matthews, K. E., & de Mello Heredia, J. (2025). Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback: student perceptions of usefulness and trustworthiness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16 | View article

Built for speed

Jot down thoughts as they come. Claire translates raw comments into actionable, encouraging feedback.

30%

Faster grading turnover with AI suggestions and voice-to-text.

A suite of tools for better assessment

Claire streamlines your assessment and feedback workflows without sacrificing quality, integrity, or your student relationships.

Universal inbox

Review, triage and grade submissions in one platform, covering your entire workflow.

Chat with documents

Find answers quickly and never miss a thing – even in the most unstructured documents.

Shows the user interface dialog to capture comments and remarks

Quick capture

Capture annotations and comments super fast for a better, more enjoyable experience.

Feedback is hard. We help you write it.

Personalization is key to a more impactful learning experience, but relying solely on Al misses the nuances and depth of human feedback.

Feedback and grading

Transform comments and approved AI suggestions into personalized feedback. Claire helps you stay aligned with your rubric.

View sample feedback

Feedback summary of instructor's notes displaying an 85% grade and detailed comments on business course concepts, assignment focus, and writing style improvements.

Shows a user interface dialog to publish a feedback report to the web

Publish in just a few clicks

Publish feedback reports to a dedicated student portal. Fully customizable, backed by research.

“Claire allows me to share personalized feedback in courses with 50+ students. This wasn't possible before and would've taken days.”

Alexander Mathias Hein (Adj. Professor)

Hong Kong Baptist University

Designed for transparency and responsible use

Why not use ChatGPT?

Claire comes with faculty-oriented features to trace, disclose and audit the use of AI in assessment, protect educators and ensure compliance with regulations.

Claire

Use of AI

Contextual, user as approver

Transparency

Full transparency through referencing

Compliance

GDPR and EU AI Act compliant

Auditability

Built-in AI tracing, disclosure and audits

ChatGPT

Use of AI

Automated, user as reviewer

Transparency

Limited, requires investigation

Compliance

Not compliant with EU AI Act

Auditability

Fairly limited, requires investigation

Talk to us about faculty licenses

Integrate Al responsibly into your workflow, aligned with the strictest Al policies.

10x

Increase your impact as a mentor and guide to all your students. Save time on repetitive work and make room for more meaningful interactions.